The global pandemic of Covid -19 has inserted itself into our everyday life. Providers are working around the clock to care for those who have been exposed, as well as those exhibiting symptoms. This is enough work to keep everyone occupied day and night, however normal everyday visits for other illness and ailments have not gone away. We understand the need to continue to see these patients, and how instrumental Telehealth will be now and over the coming weeks as the corona pandemic continues. We have compiled from various sources some links that should help answer questions regarding reimbursement for the Telehealth visits your providers might be experiencing currently. We will update this page as more information continues to flow in.
We love spending time with our amazing clients! We are grateful that they feel the same about us as we do about them. Don't take our word for it...
Whether you are dealing with a commercial payer, Medicare, or Medicaid, there are certain types of improper claims that should be avoided if you want to reduce your risk of a medical coding audit. That bit of wisdom comes from an entity that ought to know: the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General (OIG).
The OIG has released a roadmap to help new physicians avoid medical billing fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. But this advice also broadly applies to how you approach reimbursement from commercial payers, and can also serve as a helpful reminder for physicians with years of experience in practice.
The agency warns, sternly, about consequences, noting in bold type that “when the federal government covers items or services rendered to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, the federal fraud and abuse laws apply.”
When it comes to medical coding errors, the broad categories of “fraud” and “abuse” have distinct meanings. Fraud involves intentional misrepresentation. Abuse means “the falsification was an innocent mistake, but nonetheless representative,” according to the AMA’s Principles of CPT® Coding, ninth edition.
Fraud. Scary word, right? Well it happens a lot, and if you are not careful it might be happening at your practice right now. “Get a free scooter!” You may remember those words uttered on a commercial that ran continuously a few years back. In August of 2014, the Washington Post broke a story on how the government paid billions of dollars for Medicare recipients to get a free motorized wheelchair. The perpetrators of this scam were intentionally defrauding the government by using loopholes to make huge profits on markups for these chairs.
The wheelchair scam example is an outlier, but it is what most people think about when the topic of fraud is brought to the forefront, but that is just one high profile case. There are many instances of unintentional errors that can occur due to lack of understanding of the many regulations and nuances of medical billing. Consider auditing your providers for compliance and finding opportunities for improvement.
Here are 4 reasons why:
1. Billing Mistakes: still the provider's problem
Medicare and Medicaid audits are an extremely popular topic. Imagining the possibility of having your practice or hospital audited for its billing practices is a daunting thought. How simple it can be for a practice to overlook a coding change to IDC-10 or suddenly fall behind the latest PHI requirements.
Failure to stay on top of the changing landscape can lead to major financial problems down the road and the need to pay back unallowable funds. Daily we hear of OIG audits that are the results of missing a coding change or improper practice policies that can be catastrophic to the financial well being of a healthcare organization.
A few weeks ago The AAFP released its initial summary(2 page PDF) of the proposed 2019 Medicare physician fee schedule which, for the first time, also includes recommended changes that would affect CMS' Quality Payment Program in 2019. Is this good or bad for you? Let me share some quotes from the AAFP website that can be found here: https://www.aafp.org/news/government-medicine/20180724mpfssumm.html
2018 is more than halfway over. "Finishing Strong" will start to be a common message through out organizations all over the country. Goals will be set, measured, and some will be met, some will be exceeded and most will fail. What makes a good goal. What goals should you be setting for your revenue cycle and your medical coding?
2018 is more than halfway over. "Finish Strong" will start to be a common message throughout organizations all over the country. Goals will be set, measured, and some will be met, some will be exceeded...Most will fail. What makes a good goal? What goals should you be setting for your revenue cycle?
Before we get into specific goals, lets quickly what sets apart the structure of a good goal versus the structure of a poorly set goal. We call them "SMART" Goals. Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-Bound.
Specific - In terms of revenue cycle and medical coding, you should choose the particular metric you want to improve, like coding related denials, Days in AR, or Overall Medical Coding reimbursement revenue. You should also identify the team members working towards the goal, the resources they’ll have, and their plan of action.
Measurable - If you want to gauge your team’s progress, you need to quantify your goals, like achieving an X percentage increase in Denials, AR, or Reimbursement.
This proposed rule would revise the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2019 to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In this proposed rule, we describe the proposed changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the payment rates for Medicare services paid under the OPPS and those paid under the ASC payment system. In addition, this proposed rule would update and refine the requirements for the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program and the ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program. The proposed rule also includes requests for information on promoting interoperability and electronic health care information exchange, improving beneficiary access to provider and supplier charge information, and leveraging the authority for the Competitive Acquisition Program (CAP) for Part B drugs and biologicals for a potential CMS Innovation Center model. In addition, we are proposing to modify the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Survey measure under the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program by removing the Communication about Pain questions.
The concept is quite simple: Determine what is wrong with the patient, and then document what you do about it. As simple as it may seem, providers all across America struggle with this highly impactful piece of the business. Revenue and regulatory compliance are two of the most discussed topics of impact. While those two factors are of the upmost importance submitting clean claims remains one of the most important parts of any providers clinic.
Where do you start whether you are a physician, administrator, or an integral part within the revenue cycle? Below are three very important points to consider: